Ken Robinson

even so in modern day 20th century despite our harvest-time in society, anyone who wishes to pursue any dreams or aspirations in the arts is to a great extent criticized for any chance of success and is frowned upon. In this article, Robinson (2006) takes an interesting approach to shoot his point across that enlighten education systems kill creativity. He takes tether approaches which be listing, explaining and analysis. He uses hes own individualized stories and professed(prenominal) stand point to grasp the readers attention.Robinson discusses the theme speak throughout the presentations and how it will tie into his presentation. He now goes on by explaining that creativity should be treated with the same status as literacy has in education. consort to Robinson (2006) he states, We stigmatize mistakes and were now running a national education system where mistakes ar the worst thing you post make. The result of creating that stigma is that we are educating people out of their creative capacities.Robinson refers to a quote from Picasso that states all children are born artist. How will we localise these issues and keep the creative mindset if all we do is frown upon those who are more tastyally bound rather than academically bound. Robinson shares a gross(a) example of the previous statement. He shares a story of a personal friend named Gillian Lynne, a world known choreographer for Phantom of the Opera and Cats. He opposed the question to Gillian on how she became a dancer and she explained that in school she felt hopeless and could never concentrate.The teacher suggested to her parents that she had a learning derange she was sent to see a psychologist who later(prenominal) on came to the conclusion by and by observing her that Gillian was not sick in any track, she was just a dancer. She later on attended a dance school, auditioned mass Robinson 3 for the gallant Ballet Academy, graduated and founded her own company. One of many perfect examples of artistic people who became insanely successful despite the lack of academics.Robinson (2006) concludes with how there are three types of intelligence, its diverse, its dynamic and its distinct. According to Robinson (2006) We invest a bunch of time into educating children on how to succeed in the incoming but if we are unable to predict the future in five years despite our expertise the whos to say were meant to educate them for it. How will we prepare them for a time that is so furthest away and technology that has yet to be invented yet. Robinson goes into urther analyzation when he says We must encounter a new conception of human ecology, one of which we start to structure out conception of the richness of human capacity. As for the future it wont serve us. We have to rethink the fundamental principles on which were educating our children. Robinson (2006) How can we push the human capacity to its full potential drop if were not exploring all it its aspects. We would not have people comparable William Shakespeare if we didnt explore the artistic aspect and the historic change make in art and literacy.Read alsoHow Powerful Do You describe Atticus Finchs Closing Speech?Robinson did an exceptional job at capturing the readers attention and let the think of his discussion and fashioning them form their own opinion. He also backed up all(prenominal) point with a personal story and/or fact which make this more effective. He used humour as an essential way to make his presentation entertaining yet analytical. He argued both pros and cons to each paradigm in order to show he was not biased. Ken Robinson 4 Robinson theory that school kills creativity was proven to be good written and presented by adding humour, personal stories and facts. He left the readers with a lot to debate about and consider.