Coping with Death

Existentialists and intellectuals relatively possess similar views about certain subjects. Existentialists are intellectuals while some intellectuals heap be existentialists. However, there are instances when their philosophies can reveal differences which h grizzly up them stand out and identify themselves. This paper aims to discuss how one is in all likelihood to cope with the issue of death in an existential and intellectual express of view. Coping with Death Death has been the most absolute event that is outpouring to happen to hu homosexual beings even before they were born.It is one constant thing that leave alone be waiting at the end no function how well or bad we live our lives. Throughout life, there are inevitable instances when we are forced to cope with the death of someone, whether a singulars, relatives, or plainly, the thought of ours. Since existential views root from the caprice of existential philosophy and intellectual views from intellectualism, l et us first identify the distinction in the midst of these two philosophies. One of the most famous existentialists in history is the cut philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre.He defined existentialism as a philosophy which focuses on the earth of man alone and non on his essence or for either other purpose. He argued that man exists without meaning or definition. However, he express that essence and meaning completely manifest later in our lives. It is through our decisions that we come to begin the definition of our existence (Earnshaw, 2006, p. 74). Clearly, it is evident in his phone line that pietism is out of the picture. In the book Existentialism, Steven Earnshaw quoted Sartres (2006) claimIf man as the existentialist sees him is non definable, it is because to begin with he is nothing. He will not be anything until later, and then he will be what he makes of himself (p. 74). Based on the definition by Sartre, it is now reasonable to give tongue to that existentialists vi ew death as something that just happens without any meaning at all. If we are to cope with it existentially, it can be claimed that death is a trepid event because it does not provide a sensible reason.It does not estimate our meaning rather, death ends it. On the other hand, there are as well as existential arguments with regard to death which claims that death is necessary to remind us of possibilities. Without death, one would not be obliged to be cautious in his/her decisions because that individual has all the time in the world to do them in trial and error. Now, we move on to intellectualism. This philosophy is actually quite self-explanatory in nature. An intellectual acts in accordance to reason.Similar to existentialism, intellectualism also disregards the involvement of religion, for religion is based on faith which is unfounded with unassailable evidences. Nonetheless, intellectuals can have different ways of coping with death. Since reason is more complex than the idea of existence comes first by Sartre, intellectuals can vary in their purview of death. As for me, if I am to cope with death intellectually, I can start off by going back to the theory of evolution.As cerebral and mortal animals, we are capable of deteriorating because of several conditions such as diseases, old age, natural disaster, etc. Hence, death is a cycle which is scientifically formula and inevitable. Most likely, if one is to view the concept of death either existentially or intellectually, he or she is still subject to fear its arrival. However, there is a loophole in both of the arguments because the root of our existence is still questionable. They can stick up the Big Bang or the Theory of Evolution, but as far as I am concerned, there is no solid evidence of the first inhabitants on earth.As long as theories have not been proved with concrete evidence, there is no way that we can pee the answers about life and death. In any case, existentialism and intellectu alism do not provide the perfect way to cope with issues like death. What they can only provide is the flailing argument that we are considered materials which have the capability to break downcast and crash at any point in time. Would it not be better to accept death knowing that something unimaginable is waiting for us?